Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.

1. This criminal revision has been preferred against order dated 07/02/2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Varansi in Complaint Case No. 502/2012, Vipat vs Sauraybali and another under sections 420, 467, 468 IPC, PS Manduadih, whereby application for discharge of the accused-revisionists dated 30/11/2013 has been dismissed.

2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the revisionist Sri Ramendra Nath Tiwari and learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 Sri Ashok Kumar and learned A.G.A.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are as follows. Opposite party No. 2 had filed a complaint stating therein that complainant and his younger brother had ¼ share in Arazi No.36 area 6 ½ D. In the same Arazi Bodam had 1/16 share and after his death his legal heirs have been mutated. In his lifetime, Bodam executed a sale deed on 18/9/1984 of 6 ½ D. share in favour of Shashi Kapoor and Subhash; of one biswa in favour of Nirahu on 24/0 4/85; of 2283 square feets in favour of Smt. Basanti Devi on 25/5/1995; of 4 ½ D. i.e. 1957 ½ square feet in favour of Krishna Lal Talwar on 25/07/1995; 1826 square feet in favour of Mishri Lal on 29/0 6/1999