SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 932

P.K.S.BAGHEL
LALTA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Udayan Nandan and Shahsi Nandan for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Ar ticle 226 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the order dated 6.8.2015 passed by the District Magistrate whereby he has dismissed the petition from service of Lekhpal and the order passed by the Commissioner dated 30.4.2016 whereby he has dismissed his appeal.

2. A brief reference to factual aspect would suffice. The petitioner was initially appointed as Lekhpal and later on he earned his promotion to the post of Registrar Kanoongo. While he was working in Tehsil Dibai District Bulandshahr, he was served upon a charge-sheet dated 25.11.2014 containing the sole charge that while he was functioning as a Lekhpal at Tehsil Siana in the year 2002, he had submitted an incorrect report relating to a sale-deed on the basis which Tehsildar passed an order to record name of the vendee in the revenue papers. To be more specific, one Ikramul Haq had executed a registered sale-deed dated 28.8.2002 in favour of his wife Smt. Noorjahan. Tehsildar asked the petitioner to submit the report in respect of the said sale-deed. The Tehsildar passed the order for mutation based upon the petitioner, which was found
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top