ANIL KUMAR, REKHA DIKSHIT
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
SATYENDRA SINGH – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Shri Vivek Kumar Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ajey Shanker Tewari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged judgment and order dated 5.6.2015 passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow (in short 'the Tribunal’) in Claim Petition No. 1931 of 2014 (Satyendra Singh v. State of U.P. and others).
3. Facts in brief of the present case as submitted by learned State counsel for the petitioners are that the respondent No. 1/claimant filed Claim Petition No. 1931 of 2014 before the Tribunal stating therein that the respondent No. 1 was posted as Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Khand-13, Ghaziabad.
4. At the time of posting of respondent No. 1 at Aligarh as Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, II-Unit, Commercial Tax, Aligarh Zone, an incident took place in respect to which a charge-sheet dated 5.3.2012 has been issued to him by which five charges were levelled against him.
5. On 6.8.2012, the respondent No. 1/claimant submitted his reply to the charge-sheet. On 29.11.2012, after conducting enquiry, Inquiry
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.