Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GANGA NATH, J.
Firm Khincha Mal-Hari Kishan Das & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Firm Khub Ram-Munna Lal - Respondent
Decided On : 06-05-1937
ORDER
Ganga Nath, J. - This is an application in revision by the defendants against the decree of the learned Judge, Small Cause Court, Cawnpore. The suit was brought for recovery of Rs. 562-5-9 for the price of articles purchased by the defendants. The defendants contended that they were agriculturists and as such were entitled to instalments. The learned Judge has found against the defendants. It has been urged on behalf of the applicants that the suit was for a loan and that the defendants being agriculturists were entitled to relief under the Agriculturists' Relief Act. The question is whether the price for the articles purchased by the agriculturist comes under the definition of the word "loan". "Loan" as defined in Clause 10(a) of Section 2, U.P. Agriculturists' Relief Act, means an advance to an agriculturist whether of money or in kind. The price due for the articles purchased by an agriculturist cannot be regarded as an advance to him in kind. The suit was therefore not for recovery of a "loan" as defined in the U.P. Agriculturists' Relief Act. The defendants were therefore not entitled to any relief under the Act. There is no reason for interference in revision. The application is rejected.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
