SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1946 Supreme(All) 103

KAUL
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.P. Misra and Mr. G.P. Shukla, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Kaul, J. - Jagannath, a cloth dealer of Narpatganj was convicted by Mr. Iftikar Husain, Magistrate, first class, Rae Bareli, on three counts.

(1) For contravention of Rule 12(5) of the Cotton Cloth and Yarn Control Order, Central, for not exhibiting on his premises a true copy of the notifications issued by the Textile Commissioner under Clause 10 specifying the maximum price at which cloth or yarn may be sold;

(2) For contravention of Rule 19(a) of the said order; and

(3) for contravention of the U.P. Cotton Cloth and Yarn Control Order, Clause 13.

2. He was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 50 under each of the first two counts and a fine of Rs. 150 under the third count. On appeal he was acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge of Rae Bareli of the charge of contravening the provisions of Rule 19(a) of the Cotton Cloth and Yarn Control Order (Central). His convictions and the sentences passed upon him in respect of the other two counts were maintained. He has filed the present application in revision against that order.

3. The Petitioner was tried summarily by Mr. Iftikar Husain. It was contended by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the trial was illegal inasmuch as there w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top