SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 295

G. C. MATHUR
Uttar Pradesh Electric Supply Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Labour Commissioner, Gorakhpur Region – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.C. Mathur, J. - On 30 March 1961, respondent 3 (Har Prasad Pande) applied to the State Government u/s 6H (1) of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 5,612.50 as bonus on the basis of the award, dated 12 November 1959, of the Industrial Tribunal III, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad, in Case No. 57 of 1958. After hearing the parties, the Assistant Labour Commissioner Issued a certificate to the Collector for recovery of Rs. 3,162.50 from the petitioner-company. It is against issue of this certificate u/s 6H (1) of the Act that this writ petition is directed.

2. One of the points raised in the petition Is that the Assistant Labour Commissioner had no Jurisdiction to entertain the application u/s 6H(1) and to Issue the certificate. Along with the counter-affidavit filed by Sri Karuna Shankar Srivastava, Assistant Regional Conciliation Officer, Allahabad, Is annexed, as annexure B, an order of the State Government delegating Its powers u/s 6H to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh, In view of this delegation, this point does not survive.

3. The next point that was raised by learned Counsel for the petitioner is that there was no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top