SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(All) 129

SULAIMAN
Panchanan Banerji – Appellant
Versus
Upendra Nath Bhattacharji – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, J. - This is an application praying that the acquittal of the accused by the Sessions Judge should be set aside and that certain passages in the judgment, which are against the complainant's character, should be expunged.

2. Although the High Court has undoubtedly jurisdiction to set aside an order of acquittal, that power is exercised in rare and exceptional cases. In this case the learned Sessions Judge has come to the conclusion that the case was a very troublesome and difficult one, and that there was the evidence of one of the prosecution witnesses of a partnership between the accused and the complainant, and as no report was made to the police, the Judge was not satisfied that the accused was bound by any contract to dispose of the articles entrusted to him as declared by the complaisant. He is of opinion that the dispute is really a fit one for the civil Courts. The inference drawn by the Judge from a number of letters and the oral evidence is an inference of fact and it is impossible to say that his conclusion is perverse or even wrong. I cannot, therefore, accede to the prayer for setting aside the acquittal.

3. As regards the question of expunction the lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top