SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 312

C. D. PAREKH
S. C. Tayal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Tej Pal, For the Appellant / J.N. Chaturvedi and V.K. Khanna, For the Respondent

ORDER

C.D. Parekh, J. - These three cases can be disposed of by one single judgment as common questions of law and fact arise in these cases.

2. Cr. Ref. No. 288 of 1970 has been made by the 1st Temp. Civil and Sessions Judge, Aligarh, by order dated 22-4-1970. The learned Judge has recommended that the order for trying S.C. Tayal for not obtaining a licence under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, for three years (1965-66, 1966-67 and 1967-68) is untenable. He has further recommended that the charge against Capt. R.S. Gupta for the years 1965-66 and 1967-68 for not obtaining a licence for running the oil mill for extraction of mustard and ground-nut oil is also untenable and is not warranted by law. No clear or specific recommendation has been made but by making this recommendation it appears the learned judgment that the prosecution should not proceed in the matter and the charges be quashed.

3. The facts leading to this reference may be stated thus:

On 11th of June, 1968 Medical Officer of Health, Municipal Board, Aligarh, filed a complaint against (1) Om Prakash Gupta, (2) Gapt. Ram Swarup Gupta, (3) S.C. Tayal, Managercum-Chemist, Tika Ram Oil Mills, Mohalla Bara Dwari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top