SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(All) 291

HARRIS, SULAIMAN
Ghulam Murtaza – Appellant
Versus
Mt. Fasiunnissa Bibi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, C.J. - This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of a certain sum of money with interest. Originally the claim was based on two promissory notes of January 1925 and December 1927; but later the plaintiff got the plaint amended and claimed to recover an earlier debt, the time being saved by the alleged acknowledgments of 1925 and 1927. The cause of action alleged in the amended plaint was the date on which the liability of the debt was admitted by the defendant. The trial Court dismissed the suit, holding that the claim was barred by time. The lower appellate Court has come to a contrary conclusion and has decreed the claim, holding that the acknowledgment of the old debt saved time. The learned Judge had relied on the case of Govind Singh v. Bijoy Bahadur Singh 1929 All. 980, in support of his view.

2. In that case Niamatullah, J., certainly was inclined to take the view that an acknowledgment, clear and unconditional, can itself be the foundation of an action I concurred in the order on the ground that the recitals in the receipt along with the circumstances indicated that there was a renewal of previous debt, so that either the previous debt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top