Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HENRY RICHARDS, P.C. BANERJI, WALSH, JJ.
In Re: Risal Singh & Ors.
Decided On : 21-12-1915
JUDGMENT
1. In this application the applicant seeks in effect that the decree, of this Court should now be amended by disallowing a certain sum for costs, on., the ground that the payment of the fee was not authenticated in the manner provided by Rule 22, Chapter XVI, of the High: Court's Rules. It is alleged that it was necessary that there should be an affidavit made by "the party" or his agent, which ever of them made the payment, and that such an affidavit is absent. There is an affidavit on the file in which the agent of the party states that the payment was made and how, it was made. In this affidavit it is stated that the payment was made by means of a cheque of Dr. Suresh Chander Banerji. The natural inference to be drawn from the words of the affidavit is that the agent who made the affidavit got the cheque and brought it to the Pleader. This, it seems to us, is a sufficient compliance with the rule. There is, however, a further objection to the present application, namely, that the application is made after the decree has been signed and sealed. In effect we are asked to amend a decree which is now the subject-matter of an appeal to the Privy Council. We think that the application is without force and should be rejected. We order accordingly.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
