SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(All) 192

DANIELS, SULAIMAN
(Thakur) Bilas Singh – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, J. - This appeal was filed in the Court of the District Judge of Bareilly from an order of the election commissioners purporting to act as a civil Court u/s 476, Criminal P.C. As the learned District Judge happened to be one of the Commissioners himself he referred the case to this Court recommending that it should be transferred from his file. Without prejudice to the question whether an appeal lay we directed that the case be transferred to the High Court.

2. A preliminary objection has been taken on behalf of the respondent that if the commissioners had no jurisdiction to proceed u/s 476, Criminal P.C. no appeal lay from their order at all. We thick that the preliminary objection cannot prevail. The commissioners have professedly acted as a Civil Court and assumed jurisdiction u/s 476, Criminal P.C. As an appeal is expressly provided from an order passed by a civil Court u/s 476, Criminal P.C., the present appeal does lie even though the commissioners might have acted without jurisdiction. This principle was laid down as early as 1891 in the case of Jwala Prasad v. Salig Ram (1891) 13 All. 575. That this has been the uniform practice of this Court is shown by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top