IQBAL AHMAD
Manbahal Rai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Ghulam Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Iqbal Ahmad, J. - Much as I regret that the defendant, who has absolutely no title to remain in exclusive possession of the plot in dispute, succeeds in the present litigation. I cannot but affirm the decision of the lower appellate Court in this case.
2. The dispute between the parties centers round a plot of abadi land which was once the site of the house of one Khudi, who was a ryot in the village. On Khudi's death there was a race between the plaintiffs-appellants and the defendant-respondent for possession of that plot of land. The defendant succeeded in securing a license to build a house, on payment of nazrana from one Shujaat Ahmad Khan, who owns a one-anna share in the village, on the 29th August 1921. About three weeks after that date, viz., on the 23rd of September 1921, the plaintiffs-appellants were given a license to build by other cosharers of the village who owned the remaining 15-annas share in the village. After being armed with the license the plaintiffs wanted to build a house over the site in dispute, but they were unable to do so, as the defendant had already secured possession of the land and commenced to build a house. This led to the institution of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.