SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(All) 163

IQBAL AHMAD
Manbahal Rai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Ghulam Pandey – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Iqbal Ahmad, J. - Much as I regret that the defendant, who has absolutely no title to remain in exclusive possession of the plot in dispute, succeeds in the present litigation. I cannot but affirm the decision of the lower appellate Court in this case.

2. The dispute between the parties centers round a plot of abadi land which was once the site of the house of one Khudi, who was a ryot in the village. On Khudi's death there was a race between the plaintiffs-appellants and the defendant-respondent for possession of that plot of land. The defendant succeeded in securing a license to build a house, on payment of nazrana from one Shujaat Ahmad Khan, who owns a one-anna share in the village, on the 29th August 1921. About three weeks after that date, viz., on the 23rd of September 1921, the plaintiffs-appellants were given a license to build by other cosharers of the village who owned the remaining 15-annas share in the village. After being armed with the license the plaintiffs wanted to build a house over the site in dispute, but they were unable to do so, as the defendant had already secured possession of the land and commenced to build a house. This led to the institution of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top