SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(All) 210

AGARWALA, AGARWALLA
Prohit Anandi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Rex – Respondent


ORDER

Agarwalla, J. - This is a revision against an order of the learned Sessions Judge dismissing ah application in revision presented to him by the applicants against the order of the learned District Magistrate of Dehra Dun dated 2nd July 1946, which in its turn upheld the order of Mr. M. P. Tripathi, Sub-divisional Magistrate of Dehra Dun, dated 23rd March 1946.

2. The facts appear to be as follows. Mahani Paras Ram is an influential person of Rishikesh. Prohit Paras Ram another gentleman, (not to be confused with Mahant Paras Ram), was prosecuted at the instance of Mahant Paras Ram through one Jagannath, probably his servant, u/s 107, Criminal P.C. While this case was proceeding Prohit Paras Ram was ordered by the Court So enter into a bond to keep the peace during the pendency of those proceedings with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 600 each This was done. On 23rd March 1946, an incident was alleged to have happened in which Mahant Paras Ram was said to have been assaulted by Prohit Paras Ram. Thereupon an application was made to the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate that Prohit Paras Ram had forfeited the bond entered into by him and that action be taken against him and the su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top