SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(All) 167

ALLSOP
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chhajju Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Allsop, J. - This appeal arises out of a suit for the recovery of arrears of rent from certain thekadars. The defendants executed a deed of usufructuary mortgage in favour of the plaintiff and then took a theka from him. The defendants thereafter made an application u/s 4, Encumbered Estates Act. A money decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff on 28th August 1939, on the basis of the mortgage. The defendants did not get formal possession till 18th December 1940, but they were of course in actual occupation of the property as the result of the theka in their favour. The plaintiff then instituted the suit which has given rise to this appeal to recover rent from the defendants for the period from 28th August 1939 to 18th December 1940. The learned Assistant Collector dismissed the suit, but the learned Additional District Judge in appeal set aside his decision and passed a decree in favour of the plaintiff.

2. In this second appeal it is urged that the plaintiff had no proprietary interest in the property on the basis of the mortgage after 28th August 1939, and we think that this contention is right. u/s 18, Encumbered Estates Act-, the effect of the decree of a Special Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top