1970 Supreme(All) 337
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
R.L. GULATI, SATISH CHANDRA, JJ.
Commissioner, Sales Tax - Appellant
Versus
Sarin Textile Mills - Respondent
S.T.R. No's. 190 and 191 of 1969 and Special Appeal No. 119 of 1963
Decided On : 30-04-1970
V. Sarup, J. Sarup, K.L. Misra and K.C. Saxena, For the Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.L. Gulati, J. - In these three connected cases the common question of law that arises is as to whether the turnover of woolen yarn manufactured by the assessed should be taxed u/s 3 at the rate of 2 per cent. or should be assessed as yarn or woolen goods under the notifications issued u/s 3-A. It is assessable as yarn, its turnover would be assessable at the rate of six pies per rupee for the assessment year 1959-60 and at the rate of 3 per cent, for the year 1961-62 and if it is covered by the term woolen goods then it would be assessable at the rate of one anna per rupee. The notification with which we are concerned are:
(i) Notification No. ST. 907/X dated 31st March, 1956. This is a notification u/s 3-A of the Act and declares that the turnover of certain commodities mentioned therein should be taxed at a single point, at the point of sale by the manufacturer or the importer, at the rate of six pies per rupee. The relevant entry of that notification is at item No. 4 which reads:
Yarn of all kinds, including handspun fibre used in weaving other than handspun yarn, but excluding cotton yarn in cops and cones.
(ii) Notification No. ST-1365.X-990-1956 dated 1st April, 1960. It is also a notification u/s 3-A of the Act and the relevant entry is at item No. 33 which reads:
yarn of all kinds including upspun fibre used in weaving other than handspun yarn but excluding cotton yarn.
(iii) Notification No. ST-905/X dated 31st March, 1956. This again is a notification u/s 3-A of the Act and the rate of tax is one anna per rupee. The Relevant entry is at item No. 46 which reads:
Woollen goods excluding carpets but including knitting wool.
2. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of woolen carpet yarn or kati. There is no dispute about the quantum of the turnover. The dispute relates only to the rate of tax. The assessees contention was that the carpet yarn or kati was an unclassified item not covered by any of the notifications referred to above and its turnover was therefore assessable u/s 3 at multiple point at the rate of 2 per cent. The Sales Tax Officer, however, did not agree with this contention and held that the commodity in question was yarn and assessed its turnover at the rate of 6 pies per rupee for the assessment year 1959-60 and at the rate of 3 per cent, for the year 1961-62 as prescribed in notifications 1 and 2 referred to above.
3. On appeal it was contended on behalf of the department that either the notifications Nos. 1 and 2 applied or the notification No. 3 was applicable. The Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) however, did not accept this contention and held that none of the notifications applied and the turnover in dispute was assessable u/s 3 as being the turnover of an unclassified item. This finding of the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) has been upheld by the Judge (Revisions). At the instance of the Commissioner, however, the Judge (Revisions) has submitted the two references for the opinion of this court on the following question of law:
Whether the article carpet woolen yarn is covered by the term yarn mentioned in item No. 4 of Notification No. ST-907/X dated 31st March, 1956, and item No. 33 of Notification No. ST-1365/X dated 1st April 1960, taxable as 6 pies and 3 pies per cent. respectively or a kind of woolen goods as mentioned at item No. 45 taxable at one anna per rupee according to Notification No. ST-905/X dated 31st March, 1956, or whether it is an unclassified item taxable at 2 per cent.
4. The first question that arises is as to whether the commodity in dispute is woolen yarn and, if so, whether it is covered by the notifications Nos. 1 and 2 referred to above. It would be noticed that there is no material difference for the purposes of the question referred in the notification Nos. 1 and 2 except the difference in the rate.
5. The term yarn has not been defined in the Act. The Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) has quoted the meanings of this term as given vario