JUDGMENT

1. The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was a suit for the redemption of a mortgage, dated the" 21st of April 1847, stated to have been executed in favour of cerium members of the Skinner family to secure a sum of Rs. 6,288. On payment of this sum the property was according to the evidence to be redeemable. The plaintiffs are admittedly some of the heirs of the mortgagors and entitled to redeem if they can establish that the property is in the possession of the defendants-mortgagees as mortgagees by virtue of the alleged mortgage. The learned Subordinate Judge of Meerut after consideration of the evidence adduced in support of the plaintiff's case passed a decree for redemption. From this decree the present appeal has been preferred and the only question before us is as to the sufficiency of evidence adduced for the plaintiffs in proof of the alleged mortgage. * * *

2. It appears that in the year 1833 a settlement of the property in question with other property was made under the supervision of Mr. Elliot as Settlement Officer, and in the khewat prepared on the occasion of that settlement the predecessors in title of the plaintiffs are shown to have been the owners of the property in dispute. In the next settlement, described as the settlement of Mohur Singh, which was prepared during the years 1853 to 1858, the predecessors in title of the defendants, mortgagees, whom we shall shortly describe as the Skinner family, are mentioned as mortgagees of the property," whilst the alleged mortgagors are specified as "mortgagors." This is the settlement which followed that of Mr. Elliot in which there is no reference to the mortgage in favour of the members of the Skinner family. In a subsequent specification of shares of the property in dispute, prepared in the year 1276 Fasli, corresponding to the year 1869, we have entries in which not merely is the mortgage referred to but the details of it are given. In column 4, in which are recorded the names of co-sharers, several members of the Skinner family, whom it is unnecessary to mention particularly, are described as owners of five shares in all. They are described as "Europeans, residents of Bilaspur, mortgagees of the property of Durjan Singh and Bhag Singh, sons of Kunwar Singh, mortgagor. This property has been jointly mortgaged under mortgage deed for Rs. 6,288, dated the 21st of April 1847, along with that of Har Sahai and others. When the mortgagors shall pay the entire amount, the mortgage shall be redeemed." Later on in this document under serial No. 5 of the khata a similar entry appears. We find from the endorsement, that this khewat was prepared with the consent of the proprietors and verified. There is also this endorsement upon it : To-day, all the proprietors verified this khewat in my presence and they raised no objection." It thus appears that all the parties including the Skinner family verified the khewat and the entries in it, and admitted that the entries were correct. We further find from this khewat that members of the Skinner family held portion of mauza Tatarpur as proprietors. At serial No. 19 of the khata, Musammat Victoria, daughter of Mr. George Skinner, and others are described as owners of that khata in equal shares, and opposite serial No. 22 of the same khewat, Capt. Hercules Skinner and others are described as owners in equal shares of that khata, being vendee act the property of Munawar Ali, and Habib Ali, venders. Thus we gather from this khewat that not merely the members of the Skinner family held portion of the property as proprietors but also were entitled as mortgagees to other portions. In addition to this, in the khatauni of 1273 Fasli, corresponding to the years 1868 and 1869, we find an entry containing particulars of the mortgage corresponding with the entry in the khewat to which we have already referred. in it (opposite to serial No. 6) Musammat Victoria and other members of the Skinner family are described as mortgagees of