SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1917 Supreme(All) 148

P. C. BANERJI
Madho – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The two applicants, Madho and Ramanand, have been convicted u/s 332 of the Indian Penal Code, for having caused simple hurt to a constable named Ram Partit and each of them has been sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment. They have also been bound" down to keep the peace for one year u/s 1C6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure The facts as found are these. The two men with a third man named Mataphal Were returning from the Cantonment Magis. trate's Court and when they were nearing the pontoon bridge the constable Ram Partit, who was on duty, found that they were all armed with what the Magistrate calls formidable lathis. The constable enquired who they were and on being told that they were servants of a pragwal, he asked them to give up their lathis if they were not prepared to go to the thana. The men refused to surrender their lathis. The constable then told them that he would not allow them to proceed. Thereupon Madho attacked, him with a lathi and struck him several times. Ram Partit rushed at Madho and seized him by the waist and the two grappled with each other. Ramanand then struck Ram Partit with his fists until another constable appeared on the scene. For

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top