SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1909 Supreme(All) 212

AIKMAN
In Re: Nand Prasad – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Aikman, J. - This is an application for the revision of an order of a Magistrate of the first Class directing the applicants to give each a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 100 to keep the peace for one year. An examination of the record shows that the Magistrate has not complied with the procedure prescribed in Chapter VIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The summonses issued to the applicants were not accompanied by a copy of the order made u/s 112 as is required by Section 115 of the Code. Had the summonses to the applicants contained the substance of the information upon which the Magistrate acted, I might have overlooked this defect, but the summonses too are not in accord with the form set out in Schedule V No. 12 of the Code. I am unable to say that the applicants have not been prejudiced by the neglect of the Magistrate to comply with the provisions of the law. I, therefore, allow the application and set aside the order of the Magistrate, dated the 10th of October 1908. If the Magistrate deems it necessary to take further proceedings against the applicants, he must take care to comply strictly with the provisions of the law. The Magistrate has written a very hesit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top