Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AIKMAN, J.
Tota Ram - Appellant
Versus
Emperor - Respondent
Decided On : 22-02-1909
JUDGMENT
Aikman, J. - This is an application for the revision of an order of the District Magistrate of Dehra Dun, directing the prosecution of the applicant for offences under Sections 193, 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The offences are alleged to have been committed by the applicant as plaintiff in a suit for profits brought under the provisions of the Tenancy Act in the Court of an Assistant Collector of the first Class. In my opinion the order of the District Magistrate was entirely without jurisdiction and cannot be justified either u/s 195 or 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I quash the order of the District Magistrate dated the 2nd of November 1908. Any proceeding instituted against the applicant under that order must be dropped.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
