SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(All) 247

HARI SWARUP
Rishal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue, UP, Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Naresh Chandra Rajvanshi, For the Appellant / S.C. for opp. parties., For the Respondent

ORDER

Hari Swarup, J. - Rishal Singh has filed this petition against the order of the Board of Revenue dismissing the Plaintiffs' appeal arising out of a suit filed by him u/s 176 of the UP ZA and LR Act for partition of the holding.

2. The holding which is now the subject matter of dispute emerged out as a result of consolidation proceedings. The Petitioner claimed to have a one-third share in the holding along with Kashiram and Raj Singh, opposite parties Nos. 4 and 5. In the basic year the plots the valuation of which was taken into consideration for the formation of the present holding were entered in the names of Rishal Singh, Kashiram and Bharat Singh father of Raj Singh. The shares of the parties were mention-en as one-third each. According to the Petitioner no party filed any objections u/s 9 of the Act and final orders were passed by the Asstt. Consolidation Officer u/s 9-A(1)(ii) and the entry was maintained. The revised annual returns on the basis of the order were prepared u/s 10 of the Act and thereafter the allotment of chaks was made. The entries were made accordingly u/s 27 of the Act in the revenue records and consequent forms Nos. 25 and 45 were issued to the partie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top