Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GEORGE KNOX, J.
Chotey Lal - Appellant
Versus
Emperor - Respondent
Decided On : 08-02-1917
JUDGMENT
George Knox, J. - While I think that in every case, whether u/s 195 or Section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the particular statement, when the offence refers to a statement, should, be set out so that the accused person should not be taken by surprise, but should clearly know what is the statement which he is required to meet, I am not prepared to hold that the non-specification of the statament is a material irregularity. The law does not, so far as I can find out, require that the statement should be set out, and in the present case there can be no room for doubt what is the statement which the accused person has to meet. I dismiss the application with costs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
