GEORGE KNOX, P. C. BANERJEE
Abdur Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Sital Prasad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant Abdnr Rahim says that he kept a pedlar's shop in the City of Meerut : the goods from this shop were taken from time to time to fairs and exhibitions. His father Abdul Qayum carried on the same business sections He was declared an insolvent some time prior to 1913, Abdul Qayum had his shop in the Meerut Cantonments, quite separate and distinct from the shop kept by Abdur Rahim. In the year 1913, Abdul Rahim took a large amount of goods (most of them woollen goods) to the fair or exhibition held at Bulandshahr. According to the plaint Sital Prasad (respondent to this appeal and a creditor of Abdul Qayum, the insolvent) presented an application based on wrong allegations to the Additional Judge of Meerut. The date of the application, which is No 35C on the record, was the 13tb of February 1913, and the prayer in it was that the goods of Abdur Rahim in the exhibition at Bulandshahr might be taken into the custody of the Court as. the shop and the goods were the shop and the goods of Abdul Qayum the insolvent. The Additional Judge of Meerut ordered the Receiver to attach the goods. The Receiver on the 14th of February aoting upon indications given by Sital Prasa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.