SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1919 Supreme(All) 124

GEORGE KNOX, P. C. BANERJEE
Abdur Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Sital Prasad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The appellant Abdnr Rahim says that he kept a pedlar's shop in the City of Meerut : the goods from this shop were taken from time to time to fairs and exhibitions. His father Abdul Qayum carried on the same business sections He was declared an insolvent some time prior to 1913, Abdul Qayum had his shop in the Meerut Cantonments, quite separate and distinct from the shop kept by Abdur Rahim. In the year 1913, Abdul Rahim took a large amount of goods (most of them woollen goods) to the fair or exhibition held at Bulandshahr. According to the plaint Sital Prasad (respondent to this appeal and a creditor of Abdul Qayum, the insolvent) presented an application based on wrong allegations to the Additional Judge of Meerut. The date of the application, which is No 35C on the record, was the 13tb of February 1913, and the prayer in it was that the goods of Abdur Rahim in the exhibition at Bulandshahr might be taken into the custody of the Court as. the shop and the goods were the shop and the goods of Abdul Qayum the insolvent. The Additional Judge of Meerut ordered the Receiver to attach the goods. The Receiver on the 14th of February aoting upon indications given by Sital Prasa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top