Srichand vs Musammat Suraj Kuar - 1910 Supreme(All) 82

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1910 Supreme(All) 82

GRIFFIN
Srichand – Appellant
Versus
Musammat Suraj Kuar – Respondent

JUDGMENT

Griffin, J. - The suit out of which this appeal has arisen was one brought by the next reversioners for recovery of possession of the property of which one Nek Ram was the last male owner. The plaintiff-appellant in this Court is the great grandson of one Pemraj, being the grandson of Birbal, son of Pemraj Pemraj had another son named Lokman who left two sons, Manbhawan and Zalim. It has been found by the Court below that Manbhawan and Zalim were members of a joint Hindu family. On the death of Manbhawan, the name of his widow Musammat Inda was recorded in the revenue papers in succession to Manbhawan. Zalim died leaving a son named Nekram who died shortly afterwards in 1886 leaving a widow Musammat Radha who died in 1893. Before that Musammat Inda had died in 1883, and Musammat Lado, widow of Zalim, had obtained mutation of names in succession to Musammat Inda. The plaintiffs' suit in respect of Zalim's share in the estate has been decreed, but in respect to the share which, belonged to Manbhawan and in respect of which Musammat Lado had obtained mutation of names in succession to Musammat Inda, the plaintiffs' suit has been dismissed. The Court below has held that Musamma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document