SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(All) 236

C. J, MALIK
Jagarnath Prasad Shah – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Board – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Malik, CJ. - This is a plaintiff's appeal. The plaintiff claims that he has by various transfers become the owner of a plot of land, No. C.K. 37/5,5. To the north of this plot is the Khandhar of one Pandit Tikam Ram Shukla.

2. In the year 1914 land acquisition proceedings were started by the Collector of Benares who wanted to acquire the plots Nos. CK. 37/55 and 37/66 of the Khandhar of Pandit Tikam Ram Shukla for the Municipal Board so that the road known as Chauk and Neechibagh road may be widened. The notification u/s 6, Land Acquisition Act was published in due course and notices were also issued as required by Section 9. u/s 9, Sub-section (3) the Collector was also required to serve notice to the effect that the Government intended to take possession of the land and claims to compensation for interest in such land may be made to him. He also directed that notices be sent to Tikam Ram Shukla and to Mt. Chaurasi who were believed to be the owners of the two plots. The learned Judge has found that in the year 1914 plots Nos. CK. 37/55 and No. 37/56 belonged to Hari Das Rastogi and his brother Narsingh Das. No notices were given to Hari Das Rastogi and Narsingh Das.

3. Afte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top