Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GEORGE KNOX, TUDBALL, JJ.
Munna Lal - Appellant
Versus
Fateh Singh & Ors. - Respondents
Decided On : 22-02-1917
JUDGMENT
1. This is one of four connected appeals which have been referred to us u/s 195 of Local Act' II of 1901. From the order of reference and also from what has been said to us on behalf of the appellant, we find that they are all of them appeals from suits in which a question of proprietary title has been in issue in the Court of first instance and on appeals being preferred, the opposite party has expressed his intention of supporting the judgment of the Court of first instance on matters which raise a question of proprietary title in the appeals also.
2. Section 177, Clause (e), is conclusive on the point and we order the lower Appellate Court to proceed with the appeal and try it according to law
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
