SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(All) 183

BOYS
Rajpatti – Appellant
Versus
Emperor through Musammat Deoli – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Boys, J. - This is a Reference by the Sessions Judge of Benares recommending this Court to quash the order of the Joint Magistrate of Benares ordering the accused in the case Rajpatti to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 8 to Musammat Deoli, the applicant in a case u/s 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It appears that on the 15th of November 1922 the husband got a decree against the wife for restitution of conjugal rights. The Magistrate in this case was asked by the wife to give her an order for maintenance unrestricted by any condition that she should live with him. The order actually passed by the Magistrate does not expressly free her from any condition. But it was clearly intended so to do, in that the Magistrate says that he thinks "she is quite justified in refusing to live with him" and then goes on to give her an order. That order he was entitled to make under the proviso to Clause (3) of Section 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code under ordinary circumstances. The learned Sessions Judge remarks that he would consider the Magistrate's order justified if the matter were res Integra. But he considers that the decree passed on the 15th of November 1922 was binding on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top