SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(All) 128

KENDALL
Raman Lal – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kendall, J. - This is an application for revision of the order of the Additional Sessions Judge of Muttra upholding the conviction of Raman Lal u/s 408 of the Indian Penal Code. The facts of the case are given at length in the learned Judge's judgment. The main point taken on behalf of the applicant is that the trial is vitiated by joinder of charges in respect of eight separate necklaces. The applicant had been accused of committing various offences in connexion with his management of a temple, and one of the complaints against him was that he had stolen eight necklaces, valued at about Rs. 15,000 which had been in the possession of the temple. The Magistrate framed a charge against him to the following effect:

That you on or about the day following Annakut day of Sambat 1977, corresponding to 12th November 1920, at Gokal, being a servant of Mt. Maha Lakshmi Bahuji, committed theft in respect of eight necklaces Valued at Rs. 15,000 which necklaces were in the possession of your employer, the said Maha Lakshmi Bahuji.

2. And the Magistrate found it to be proved that the applicant had not committed theft on any particular day, but that he had committed criminal breach of trust

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top