SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 389

GYANENDRA KUMAR, YASHODA NANDAN
Phulbasi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sankatha Rai for opposite party, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Yashoda Nandan, J. - The main question arising for consideration in this reference is as to whether an order passed u/s 488(1), Code of Criminal Procedure is rendered ineffective and inoperative because of a temporary reunion between the parties to the proceedings. The case has been referred to a larger Bench by a learned single Judge of this Court because of the conflict between Pearey Lal v. Smt. Naraini 1935 AWR 11331 decided by Ganga Nath, J. and Nathu Ram v. Smt. Rashmani 1967 AWR 722 decided by Rajeshwari Prasad, J.

2. The relevant facts giving rise to this reference are that the Applicant Smt. Phulbasi who is admittedly the legally wedded wife of the opposite party, Shivnath, made an application in 1952 u/s 488, Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of maintenance allowance on the ground that her husband neglected and refused to maintain her. Her application was allowed and Shivnath was ordered to pay Rs. 30/- per month to her as maintenance allowance. A revision preferred by Shivnath was dismissed on 9-7-1954. Thereafter Smt. Phulbasi made an application for recovery of arrears of maintenance allowance but some sort of reconciliation took place between the parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top