SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(All) 223

BAJPAI
Sarnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


ORDER

Bajpai, J. - This is an application by Sarnam Singh, Kishen Lal and Ram Phool alias Man Phool who were tried by a Magistrate of the first class u/s 368, Penal Code, and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 100 fine. Their conviction and sentence were affirmed in appeal by the learned Sessions Judge.

2. In revision it has been argued before me that the learned Magistrate had no jurisdiction to try this case. It is said that u/s 368, Penal Code, the accused who wrongfully conceals or keeps in confinement a kidnapped or abducted girl shall be punished in the same manner as if he had kidnapped or abducted such person with the same intention or knowledge or for the same purpose as with that or for which he conceals or detains such person in confinement. The argument is that it is possible that according to circumstances an offence u/s 368, Penal Code, might be punishable in the same manner as an offence u/s 363, Penal Code, or as an offence u/s 366, Penal Code. An offence u/s 363, Penal Code, is triable by a Court of Session, Presidency Magistrate or Magistrate of the First Class, but an offence u/s 366, Penal Code is triable exclusively by a Court of Session.

3. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top