SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(All) 102

ASHWORTH, KANHAIYA LAL
Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Aligarh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kanhaiya Lal, J. - The dispute in this appeal relates to a piece of muafi land occupied by a grove situated in Qasba Koil, close to the town of Aligarh. The land was originally granted by the predecessors of the plaintiff to Sirh Mal, the predecessor of the contesting defendant, for planting a grove, and the question for consideration is whether the descendants of Sirh Mal had a right to sell the grove to Chunna and Ram Lal, and are liable to ejectment in consequence. The allegation of the plaintiff was that there was a custom appertaining to the muafis granted by the zemindars by virtue of which the muafi holders or their descendants had no right to transfer the muafi by sale. The plaintiff questioned the right of the son and grandsons of Sirh Mal to transfer the grove, and he sued for the cancellation of the sale and for possession of the grove by the ejectment of the muafidars and their transferees.

2. The plaintiff relied in support of the custom on the wajib-ul-arz prepared in 1872 in which under the heading referring to "muafis granted by the zemindar for specific purposes," it was stated that so long as the muafidar or his descendants remained in possession, there wil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top