SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(All) 236

LINDSAY
Musammat Dulari Koer – Appellant
Versus
Salig Ram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lindsay, J. - The appellant in both these oases is Musammat Dulari Kunwar, who I is a Zemindar in the village Ganaura. She brought two suits against certain tenant of this village alleging that about a year or a year and a half before the suits were brought, these persons had encroached on her land in the village by putting up building, In short, her case was that these defendants occupied houses in the village and that they bad enlarged them by encroaching upon laid which belonged to her Musammat Dulari Kunwar claimed that, in the circumstances, she was entitled to a decree directing the defendants to demolish these new structures.

2. Both the Courts below have dismissed the plaintiff's suits. They have not believed the evidence which she put forward for the purpose of showing that the buildings demolition of which was sought, had been created shortly before the suits were filed.

3. The Courts also appear to have decided both cases on the consideration that Musammat Dulari had stood by and acquiesced in the construction of these buildings.

4. It has been argued before me that the judgments of the Courts below are erroneous, (sic)inasnueh as the learned District Judge has take

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top