Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PIGGOTT, J.
Sadar Singh Kondari - Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh Kondari - Respondent
Decided On : 06-02-1923
JUDGMENT
Piggott, J. - I hold that the High Court of Kumaun is not a Court subordinate to this High Court for purposes of revisional jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure. There is a special procedure provided by Statute, in accordance with which the Local Government can, upon cause being shown to its satisfaction, refer to this Court for opinion any judgment or order passed by the Kumaun High Court. It cannot have been the intention of the Legislature that it should be left open to any dissatisfied litigant in Kumaun to evade these provisions by coming direct to this Court with a petition invoking its revisional jurisdiction. I reject this application.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
