SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 393

C. D. PAREKH
Col. Sujan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
C.P. Johri, C.S. Saran and Devendra Behari, For the Appellant / Girdhar Nath, For the Respondent

ORDER

C.D. Parekh, J. - These are seven revisions arising out of the order dated 27-9-1968 passed by Shri H.C. Agarwal, Special Judge. (Anti-Corruption) (West), Luck-now, wherein common questions of law and fact have been agitated and are involved and can conveniently be disposed of by one single judgment.

2. In all these revisions the sanction orders (a sample of which has been reproduced in the body of the lower court's order) for the prosecution of the Applicants, for offences u/s 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 (Act No. II of 1947) have been challenged. In some of the cases the sanction relates to offences punishable u/s 120(b) and Section 420 IPC as well. Sanction orders have been signed by the Deputy Secretary of the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. The sanctions have been accorded under the provisions of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898) and Section 6(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1.947, for the prosecution of Col. Sujan Singh, Major Inder Singh and Captain Harvans Singh who were Commissioned officers in the employment of the Union of India and M.N. Mukerjee who was a civili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top