SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(All) 188

KISCH
Ajay Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


ORDER

Kisch, J. - The applicant, Ajay Kumar Ghosh, has been ordered by a First Class Magistrate to execute a personal bond for Rs. 2,000 with two sureties each in the same amount to be of good behaviour for one year. On appeal the order of the Magistrate was affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge of Cawnpore. The case against the applicant was that he was a member of the revolutionary party and was so desperate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security hazardous to the community. The learned Sessions Judge has written a very careful judgment in disposing of the applicant's appeal. He has considered every point that could be considered in favour of the applicant and I do not find that there is any ground for interfering' with his order in revision.

2. A.K. Ghosh was arrested in 1929 in connection with the Lahore conspiracy case, but he was acquitted in that case in the following year. It is however proved by the evidence that he was associating in Cawnpore with a number of persons who are known to be members of the revolutionary party. Several of these associates are strongly suspected of taking part in dacoities committed in pursuance of revolutionary objects. On

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top