SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 331

ROY, TAKRU
Mst. Mohmudi – Appellant
Versus
Mustaque Ali – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri M.A. Kazrai, For the Appellant / Sri H.C. Sharma, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Roy, J. - This is a second appeal by the Plaintiffs arising out of a suit for pre-emption under the Mohamedan law. Connected with this second appeal is a civil revision by Mushtaq Ali Defendant No. 1, the vendee, who had put in an application u/O. 21, R. 97 of the CPC and which was dismissed by the learned Munsif on 12-12-1950.

2. The facts are not disputed. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4 belonged to one family. Defendant No. 2 Smt. Bashiran is the wife of one Nabi Bux. Nabi Bux and Smt. Bashiran have a daughter Mahmodi Begum, who is Plaintiff No. 1, and three sons Mohammad Nabi, Aley Nabi and Haidar Bux. Smt. Aisha Begum Defendant No. 3 is the wife of Mohammad Nabi. Smt. Sarwari Begum Defendant No. 4 is the wife of Aley Nabi. Smt. Sultani Plaintiff No. 2 is the daughter of Haidar Bux. On 24 8-1945, Defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4 executed a sale-deed in favour of Defendant No. 1 with respect to two houses in the city of Moradabad for a consideration of Rs. 2,000. One of the houses belonged in its entirety to Defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4. In regard to the other house it was asserted on behalf of the Plaintiffs that 5/6th of it belonged to them in their own right

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top