SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(All) 265

Gajadhar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Muhammad Abdul Majid – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mears, C.J. - A preliminary objection has been taken to the hearing of this appeal on the ground that DO appeal lies u/s 10 of the Letters Patent. In support of this contention our attention has been drawn to the ruling of this Court in Piari Lal v. Madan Lal (1917)39 All. 191= 15 A.L.J. 46= 39 I.C. 460. The present case is indistinguishable in principle from the ruling in that ease. Following that ruling we must hold that no appeal lien; and accordingly we dismiss the appeal but make no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top