C. S. P. SINGH
Nabiul Rahman – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER
C.S.P. Singh, J. - The Petitioner was convicted Under Sections 305/147/148/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. The Petitioner after serving a part of the sentence in jail custody was released by the State Government under order passed u/s 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, whereby his remaining part of the sentence was suspended. The order suspending the sentence was to take effect on the Petitioner executing a (sic) to comply with certain conditions let out therein (Annexure "B" to the ' writ petition). This order suspending the sentence was cancelled on 16-9-1970 on the ground that the Petitioner had committed a breach of condition No. 2 of the bond.
2. It is not disputed that no formal notice was given to the Petitioner before passing the impugned order of cancellation. All that has been alleged in the counter-affidavit that the Sub Inspector of Police informed him of the allegation made against the Petitioner that he had committed a breach of the condition of the bond the order suspending the sentence and directing release of the Petitioner was a valuable one, so far as liberty of tint Petitioner was concerned. This order could not in fairness be cancell
A.K. Kraipak and Others Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others
Chandra Bhavan Boarding and Lodging, Bangalore Vs. The State of Mysore and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.