SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(All) 121

LINDSAY
Mt. Taskin Fatma – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Munim Baksh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Lindsay, J. - This appeal is directed against an order made by the District Judge of Budaun on 4th March 1927, in Miscellaneous Case No. 34 of 1920.

2. In order to understand the matter which is in contention before us, it is necessary to say that the appellant here, Mt. Taskin Fatma, is a minor, the daughter of one Ghafur Baksh, deceased. She is now married to Qayum Baksh who after becoming her husband, was appointed by the District Judge of Budaun as the guardian of Taskin Fatma's person and property under the Guardians and Wards Act 8, 1890. Before Qayum Baksh married this minor girl her guardian in the Court of the District Judge was her uncle Sattar Baksh, and while Sattar Baksh was acting as guardian under the Court, he, with the consent of the District Judge, entered into certain arbitration proceedings in order to settle disputes between the sons of the deceased Ghafur Baksh and this girl Mt. Taskin Fatma, regarding the division of the property. Admittedly an award was passed and that award was subsequently made a rule of the Court.

3. In the month of August 1926, after Qayum Baksh had been appointed guardian of his wife, he presented a petition to the District Judge,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top