SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 379

R. L. GULATI
Musaddi Lal Bishan Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Suri, For the Appellant /

ORDER

R.L. Gulati, J. - A common question arises in this and the connected writ petition. The facts are also identical. Therefore, the two petitions shall be disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The Petitioner holds a licence under the U.P. Excise Act in F.L. 17 for the retail vend of denatured spirit in the district of Pauri Garhwal. He is holding, the licence since 1956 which is being renewed from year to year. The licence was last renewed on April 1, 1972, valid for one year and ending on 31st March, 1973. On September 16, 1972, the third Respondent, the District Magistrate, Pauri-Garhwal, issued an order to the Excise Inspector Incharge of the circle, stating that in view of the various complaints of the misuse of the denatured spirit, the State of Uttar Pradesh has ordered that F.L. 17 licences at Deoprayag, Satpuli and Dogadda be cancelled. The Excise Inspector was accordingly directed to get the shop of the Petitioner closed and his licence cancelled and deposited in the office of the District Magistrate. In pursuance of this order the fourth Respondent, the Excise Inspector, inspected the shop of the Petitioner and made a note on September 19, 1972 in the register maintain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top