JUDGMENT

D.N. Roy, J. - This application in revision is by Rampal against an order of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Ghaziabad passed on 1-12-1955, giving the custody of certain bullocks to Hirdan Singh. A revision was filed against that order before the learned Sessions Judge but it was rejected by him on 19-1-1956, on the ground that the order delivering the bullocks to Hirdan Singh appears to be justified in the circumstances of the case.

2. The first point which has been contended on behalf of the applicant is that when the Magistrate had passed an order on 22-1-55, directing that the bullocks be given to the custody of Rampal on taking security from him in the sum of Rs. 1 500/- that order became final and it was not open to the Magistrate to supersede that order subsequently on 1-12-1955, by which he directed that the bullocks be given to Hirdan Singh on the furnishing of proper security. It has next been contended that the Sub-Divisonal Magistrate was not competent to review the earlier order of 22-1-(sic).

3. Narain Singh and Rampal pre related to each other. On 28-10-1955 a marpit took place. In connection with that marpit one report was lodged by Udai Singh, who co