SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 348

A. N. MULLA
District Board – Appellant
Versus
Noor Mohammad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.H. Beg and Jagnandan Lal, For the Appellant / Prem Narain Shukla, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

A.N. Mulla, J. - The District Board Muzaffarnagar prosecuted Noor Mohammad and eight others u/s 175 of the District Boards Act, 1920, for breach of Rule 7 of the bye-laws framed u/s 174(1) and Section 106 of the District Boards Act. These bye-laws were published in the UP Gazette of 23-1-1954, Part III at page 36.

2. Bye-law No. 7 reads as follows:

No person shall work or run a sugar factory within the rural area of the district unless and until he has been granted on payment of the requisite fee a licence for the same by the District Board and possess such a licence for the relevant period.

3. The word 'factory' defined in these bye-laws includes a flour mill, a cane crusher and other kinds of machineries. The charge against the opposite parties was that they were running factories in Jalalabad town which is a rural area appertaining to the District Board, Muzaffarnagar, in the year 1953-54 without taking out the required licences.

4. Two of the opposite parties Phul Chand and Bhullan Singh were prosecuted in the same case. In all eight complaints were filed.

5. The opposite parties admitted that they were running factories, but they contended that the factories were situate in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top