SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 449

BHARGAVA
RAM LAL BACHAI RAM – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, UNITED AND CENTRAL PROVINCES. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BHARGAVA, J. - The assessee in this case is a Hindu undivided family carrying on business under the name and style of Ram Lal Bachai Ram. The head office of the assessee with a cloth shop was situated at Samohi in the district of Jaunpore in British India and it also ran a branch cloth shop at Bhadohi in the erstwhile Banaras State during the year of account corresponding to the assessment year 1940-41. Cloth worth Rs. 77,469 was sent in the year of account from Bhadohi to Samohi and cash and cloth to the extent of Rs. 65,931 was sent from Samohi to Bhadohi. There was an excess remittance of Rs. 11,538 from Bhadohi to Samohi, it was an admitted fact that profits were available at Bhadohi for remittance to the place of residence of assessees family at Samohi in British India. In these circumstances, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, held that this balance of Rs. 11,538 represented profits earned by the firm at Bhadohi outside British India and that, by these transactions entered into in the year of account, this amount had been received in British India by firm. The assessee contended that this amount did not represent profits of the Bhadohi firm received i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top