SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(All) 111

SEN
Phul Chand Dube – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sen, J. - Phul Chand Dube has been convicted by a Magistrate of the first class u/s 411, I.P.C. and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment. He appealed and the conviction and sentence were confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge of Ghazipur. Phul Chand Dube comes up before this Court with an application for revision and challenges the propriety of the conviction and sentence.

2. The facts of the case lie within a very narrow compass and may be briefly outlined here. One Sahodar Patakh of the district of Chapra owned a bullock. His bullock was missing. This bullock, after several months, was traced in the possession of Phul Chand Dube, the applicant. The bullock was taken possession of by the police and Phul Chand Dube was prosecuted u/s 411. I.P.C., with the result which has been indicated above.

3. The learned Magistrate and the learned Additional Sessions Judge do not appear to have approached the case from the proper angle and I am not surprised that they have failed to view the matter in its true perspective. In order to bring home the guilt u/s 411, I.P.C., it is essential that some stolen property should have been found in the possession of the accused and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top