SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(All) 356

BENNET, LAL GOPAL MUKERJI
Janki Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Majid Khan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Panna Lal and Haripal Varshni, For the Appellant / Mansur Alam and C.B. Agarwala, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Mukerji and Bennet, JJ. - This is a first appeal by the Defendants against a decree for possession and mesne profits awarded by the Court of first instance. The facts in this case are as follows: Niadar Mal had a simple money decree against one Nand Kishore in suit No. 219 of 1923, and on the 29th November, 1923, he attached the property of his judgment-debtor. On the 21st May, 1924, he brought to auction-sale certain zamindari property in Mohiuddinpur Baklana and this was bought by the present Defendants in this case Janki Prassrd Bed Ram and Nathan Lal. On the 17th August, 1924, formal possession was given to these Defendants. Meanwhile other proceedings had been going on in regard to this property. There was a simple mortgage dated 28th September, 1920, by Nand Kishore in favour of Abdul Majid and Abdul Wahid for Rs. 20,000, and in this mortgage the zamindari property in Mohiuddinpur Baklana had been mortgaged along with certain other zamindari property in Bagrasi and six shops in Bagrasi. On the 19th May, 1924, Abdul Majid alone brought a suit, No. 114 of 1924, on this mortgage making his brother a pro forma Defendant as he was absent. On the 26th August, 1924, a prelim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top