SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(All) 394

RYVES
Kalu alias Kallan – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ryves, J. - In this case Kallu has been ordered to be bound down u/s 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The notice issued against him u/s 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that he is a thief by profession and habitually commits extortion. A large number of witnesses for the prosecution were produced and they generally say that Kallu has the reputation of being a harbourer of thieves and commits extortion. They go on to say that he has no other means of livelihood, and in cross-examination, most of them said that he had no cultivation or business, The learned Magistrate has accepted this evidence and on the strength of this evidence has passed the order u/s 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was confirmed in appeal, but it is quite evident from the learned District Magistrate's order that the evidence against Kallu is extremely slight; indeed, he says so himself, The accused, who is a man of sixty years, had apparently never been suspected by the Police until early in this year when a dacoity was committed at the house of one Gobardhan Jat. He was respected, not of having taken part in the dacoity, but of helping one of the accused, a relation of his, in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top