SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(All) 399

GOKUL PRASAD, GRIMWOOD MEANS
Bind Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rituraji – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The circumstances under which this appeal has arisen areas follows:--- One Kunj Behari Singh died many years ago leaving a widow Musammat Jamna Kunwar. She died in the year 1914. After her death, two persons, Sheo Narain Singh and Chotku Singh, applied for mutation as nest reversioners. Their application was opposed by Musammat Rituraji, the respondent No. 1, who represented herself to be the daughter of Kunj Behari Singh, and raid she was as such entitled to the property. She lost her case in the Revenue Court and afterwards brought a suit for declaration of her title as the heiress of Kunj Behari Singh as against Chotku Singh and Sheo Narain Singh, the next reversioners. Her suit was decreed by the Court of first instance and that decree was confirmed, on appea), by this Court, in 1919.

2. The present plaintiffs, who allege themselves to be remoter reversioners, as compared to Sheo Narain Singh and Chatku Singh, commenced this litigation on the 17th of June, 1919, claiming possession of the property of Kunj Behari Singh against Musammat Rituraji Kunwar, and Chotku. Singh and Sheo Narain Singh, the immediate reversioners. After stating the fasts, of which we have given a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top