SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(All) 384

GOKUL PRASAD, GRIMWOOD MEARS, KANHAIYA LAL, PIGGOTT, SULAIMAN
Lallu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gur Narain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The only point referred to the Full Bench for consideration is the question of the validity or otherwise of a deed of gift, dated the 29th of January 1894, executed by Musammat Tulsha Kunwar, in favour of her only daugter, Musammat Naraini Kunwar. This document recites that Musammat Naraini Kunwar was her sole issue, and the donor wished to give the entire property in seven villages to her; but that, inasmuch as during her lifetime she had also to provide for her own maintenance and other necessary expenses, and it was reprehensive and forbidden for her to receive any benefit or to take anything from her daughter, she considered it proper to get the name of her daughter recorded over four villages at once, but to remain in possession of the other three villages for her life, meeting the expenses of her maintenance and other necessary expenses from the profits thereof. But all the seven villages were comprised in the gift, and it was stated that she had no longer any claim or right left in respect of all the property gifted, and the donee would have all the powers of a proprietor, with this exception that the three villages last mentioned would remain in her possession du

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top