SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(All) 346

SULAIMAN
Tula Ram – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sulaiman, J. - This is an application in revision from a conviction u/s 417 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The facts as found by the Courts below, about which in revision there cannot be much dispute, are as follows:

Some five years ago the accused had borrowed Rs. 562-8 as loans on different occasions from the complainant. The complainant was asking for the re-payment of the loan, and it is said that a serious demand was made for the return of this money last year. The accused " is said to have made promises to re-pay. Sometime before the alleged occurrence, it is also in evidence, that he sent a letter to the complainant saying that he would be sending money under a registered cover. On the 8th of March the accused admittedly sent a registered and insured cover to the address of the complainant. When this cover was received by the complainant he did not open it at the Post Office but took it home and opened it in the presence of a number of witnesses. On opening it he discovered that instead of five Government Currency Notes of Rs. 100 each, there were five khilafat bonds, which are of course of no money value. On this he reported the matter to the Post

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top