SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 275

ASTHANA
Nanku – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Majeeduddin, for, 2 and 3, Mohd. Baqar Usmani, for 1 and 2 and Hasin Ahmad for No. 2, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Asthana, J. - Bashir has been convicted under Sections 363, 366, 366A and 368, I.P.C. and has been sentenced to five years u/s 363, I.P.C., seven years' rigorous imprisonment under each of the two Sections 366 and 366A I.P.C. and four years' rigorous imprisonment u/s 368, I.P.C. by the Sessions Judge of Mirzapur for kidnapping a minor girl Kumari Phulwa from the lawful guardianship of her uncle Gulli with whom she was residing at that time and for wrongfully concealing her in his house after kidnapping her. Nanku has been convicted under Sections 365A and 368, I.P.C. in respect of the same offences and has been sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment for each of these two offences and his sentences have been made concurrent. Muhammad accused has also been convicted u/s 366-A and 368, I.P.C. and has been sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment for each of these offences. Mohd. Shafi, Durga and Smt. Mahraji have each been convicted under Sections 366A, 368 and 372. I.P.C. for kidnapping her, wrongfully concenaling her after she had been kidnapped and for selling her in marriage to one Mathura Brahman. Durga has been sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top