SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(All) 384

HARI SWARUP
Som Dutt Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Chand Kishore, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Standing Counsel, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Hari Swarop, J. - This petition arises out of proceedings under Section 3 (1) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of rent and Eviction Act Landlord applied for permission to file a suit for the eviction of the tenant. The District Magistrate granted the permission. Against the permission granted by the District Magistrate, the tenant went up in revision. The Commissioner allowed the revision and rejected the application for permission. The landlord filed a revision before the State Government under Section 7-F of the Act watch was allowed. The tenant has challenged the order of the State Government through this writ petition.

2. The findings of the State Government are that the landlord is in the armed forces, that after three or four years he is likely to retire from service that be may be tent to the front and then his family may need accommodation and that it will take time to get the accommodation vacated through suit and by that time the landlord may retire from service. None of these grounds is relevant. Thus, the State Government has found that the landlord would not require the accommodation for three or four years. It is conjectural that the landlord might be sent to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top